Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11

ADR vs Fusion

This is a discussion on ADR vs Fusion within the Artificial Disc Replacement forums, part of the Spine Surgery Support category; So, I gave my story in my intro. Give it to me straight folks. I want to know people's opinion ...

  1. #1
    Senior Member bigdogchief76's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Wichita KS
    Posts
    141

    Default ADR vs Fusion

    So, I gave my story in my intro.

    Give it to me straight folks. I want to know people's opinion on my situation. Hearing different views will help me make the decision, in conjunction with my back surgeon's opinion. I value both sides of the story.

    Fusion is being denied via the insurance company. Formal appeal has been started with it as of Friday the 10 Dec 2010.

    Insurance company will (according to their policy and if the patient meets the criteria) pay for the ADR. I've looked at the policy until I'm blue in the face, and I believe my condition fits what they say meets their criteria (it's crazy that the insurance company dictates what I can do...frustrating)

    The AD has to be approved by the FDA.

    Cuss and discuss...what do you all think??
    Matt Brown

    L5-S1 DDD with retrolisthesis, central HNP and severe discogenic pain
    18 March 2011 - Pro-Disc L installation
    Proud Air Force Veteran
    Daddy to 2 beautiful little girls

  2. #2
    Moderator KBear's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Denton, Texas
    Posts
    2,941

    Default Re: ADR vs Fusion

    Quote Originally Posted by bigdogchief76 View Post
    Cuss and discuss...what do you all think??
    Haha, you made me laugh. Honestly, I would go for the fusion, being that it's the lowest level. In my opinion, that leaves you open if in the future you needed more spine surgery to get ADR(s) above that level. Unfortunately, the nature of spine problems is that eventually most of us are going to have more spine problems. Even though ADR supposedly slows/ stops degeneration, there are many who had ADR and then needed or do need more surgery on adjacent levels because of continued degeneration.

    The other questions that come to my mind regarding why your doctor recommended fusion in the first place are: 1) Did he see something on your imaging that led him to believe you were not a good candidate for ADR? (ie. degenerated facet joints) 2) Did he say fusion because he only does fusion? 3) Is there some other reason why he felt it was better for you? Both are major operations and all pros and cons should be weighed before going forward. I would also suggest getting a couple of more opinions, even if you have zero intention of using anyone else, they may see something or bring up some other point worth considering.
    31 years old- 1/06- In wreck with 18 wheeler at 25 years old; 6/06- Head on collision on Interstate, both wrecks other drivers fault. Numerous MRI's, PT, chiropractic, acupuncture, TENS therapy, massage therapy, facet injections, epidural injections, Nerve study, Discogram, confirms pain in L4/5, IDET, decompression, Bi-lateral neurotomy L3/4/5, denied by insurance twice, in Active L clinical trial, had surgery March 17, 2009 in Miami, FL- received Active L disc at 29 years old. Pain and medication free as of October 2010!Mommy to Emma- 8 years, Ava- 6 years & had baby Eli after ADR, via c-section on March 25, 2011 , completely pain free still!

  3. #3
    Senior Member bigdogchief76's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Wichita KS
    Posts
    141

    Default Re: ADR vs Fusion

    Quote Originally Posted by KBear View Post
    The other questions that come to my mind regarding why your doctor recommended fusion in the first place

    I talked with the surgeon's PA today (who is a great friend of mine). He seems to think (for better of worse) that potentially he does not mention ADR because of past denials of insurance claims. He's a fusion first type of doctor, with a long proven track record of successful fusion's. Now that insurance companies seem to be flip-flopping on approving ADR over fusion (I've read some of the medical discussions that AETNA quoted, and quite frankly, based off stats, I have to concur; not that I will EVER give AETNA the benefit of knowing that) I have to believe that he might begin doing ADRs.

    I'll know tomorrow or Tuesday on what my surgeon thinks.
    Matt Brown

    L5-S1 DDD with retrolisthesis, central HNP and severe discogenic pain
    18 March 2011 - Pro-Disc L installation
    Proud Air Force Veteran
    Daddy to 2 beautiful little girls

  4. #4
    Founder / Administrator Justin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Philadelphia
    Posts
    4,503

    Default Re: ADR vs Fusion

    If I was in your shoes with only L5-S1 needing surgical attention, I would have a fusion. Just my .

    Good luck!

    Justin Averna
    Founder & President, Spine Patient Society™
    www.SpinePatientSociety.org
    A 501(c)(3) Tax-Exempt Nonprofit & Charitable Organization


    • 1994: Football Injury, Severe Hyperextension
    • 1997: Snow Skiing Injury
    • 3/7/1997: Laminotomy L4/L5
    • 1999 & 2003: Motor Vehicle Accidents (not at fault both times) --> Grade V Annular Tears L4/L5 & L5/L6
    • 11/15/2003: 2-Level ProDisc® L4/L5 & L5/L6*, *lumbosacral transitional vertebra --> Dr. Rudolf Bertagnoli
    • 4/2008: 4.5 years pain-free before "new" leg pain
    • 5/14/2009: Dynamic Stabilization System L4/L5, Dr. Rudolf Bertagnoli
    I'm here to help.
    Questions? Suggestions? Need help with registering, creating a signature, etc.?
    justin (at) spinepatientsociety.org


    Disclosure: I have no financial relationships with any surgeons, spine clinics, device manufacturers, pharmaceutical companies, hospitals, etc. -- the SPS Board of Directors serve without compensation.

  5. #5
    Senior Member ajj1001's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Manchester, UK
    Posts
    1,309

    Default Re: ADR vs Fusion

    I'd get a couple more medical opinions and check out how likely you are to get any problems at higher levels.
    Alison 46 year old female
    2012 Doing Rehab
    2011 Sept 3rd Op Removal of old instrumentation and PLIF L4/L5 - L5/S1 both adr in situ
    2010 May Discogram on L2/L3 & L3/L4
    2009 May 2nd Op Failed revision fusion on L5/S1 with Charite ADR in situ
    2008 Caudal epidural exacerbated nerve symptoms. Prolapse L2/L3
    2007 L5/S1 Facet deterioration
    2002 March 1st Op ADR Charite - L4/5, L5/S1
    2000 Disc prolapses L4/5, L5/S1

  6. #6
    Senior Member bigdogchief76's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Wichita KS
    Posts
    141

    Default Re: ADR vs Fusion

    So spoke with Dr Chang this afternoon. He does not feel that ADR's are as effective for my particular condition (one level aggressive DDD, etc.)

    I've spoken with some other doctors as well, and all are concurrent with single level fusion. Not one said ADR.

    Sooooo.....it's time to wait patiently on the Lord and let the appeal process work. (If you aren't religious, then I'm waiting patiently on the insurance company... )

    Office did get in a lengthy letter from Dr Chang on an Urgent Care Appeal that sounds like can be used for my case. I also submitted my heart-felt request in conjunction with the appeal.

    Thanks for your feedback....

    MB
    Matt Brown

    L5-S1 DDD with retrolisthesis, central HNP and severe discogenic pain
    18 March 2011 - Pro-Disc L installation
    Proud Air Force Veteran
    Daddy to 2 beautiful little girls

  7. #7
    Moderator KBear's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Denton, Texas
    Posts
    2,941

    Default Re: ADR vs Fusion

    Matt,
    That makes it a lot easier when all the doctors agree on the course of treatment. I'll be praying you get approval soon. BTW- You have a beautiful family.
    31 years old- 1/06- In wreck with 18 wheeler at 25 years old; 6/06- Head on collision on Interstate, both wrecks other drivers fault. Numerous MRI's, PT, chiropractic, acupuncture, TENS therapy, massage therapy, facet injections, epidural injections, Nerve study, Discogram, confirms pain in L4/5, IDET, decompression, Bi-lateral neurotomy L3/4/5, denied by insurance twice, in Active L clinical trial, had surgery March 17, 2009 in Miami, FL- received Active L disc at 29 years old. Pain and medication free as of October 2010!Mommy to Emma- 8 years, Ava- 6 years & had baby Eli after ADR, via c-section on March 25, 2011 , completely pain free still!

  8. #8
    Founder / Administrator Justin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Philadelphia
    Posts
    4,503

    Default Re: ADR vs Fusion

    Good luck with everything!

    Justin Averna
    Founder & President, Spine Patient Society™
    www.SpinePatientSociety.org
    A 501(c)(3) Tax-Exempt Nonprofit & Charitable Organization


    • 1994: Football Injury, Severe Hyperextension
    • 1997: Snow Skiing Injury
    • 3/7/1997: Laminotomy L4/L5
    • 1999 & 2003: Motor Vehicle Accidents (not at fault both times) --> Grade V Annular Tears L4/L5 & L5/L6
    • 11/15/2003: 2-Level ProDisc® L4/L5 & L5/L6*, *lumbosacral transitional vertebra --> Dr. Rudolf Bertagnoli
    • 4/2008: 4.5 years pain-free before "new" leg pain
    • 5/14/2009: Dynamic Stabilization System L4/L5, Dr. Rudolf Bertagnoli
    I'm here to help.
    Questions? Suggestions? Need help with registering, creating a signature, etc.?
    justin (at) spinepatientsociety.org


    Disclosure: I have no financial relationships with any surgeons, spine clinics, device manufacturers, pharmaceutical companies, hospitals, etc. -- the SPS Board of Directors serve without compensation.

  9. #9
    Moderator Cindylou's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Minneapolis, Minnesota
    Posts
    2,380

    Default Re: ADR vs Fusion

    Matt, If I were you I would also get a fusion at L5-S1, and that's exactly what I did, in fact. 2.5 years ago, July 08. I wouldn't hesitate for a second on that one. It has served me well. Again, just my 2 cents. Nice to see your new "avatar" up......Family. And one lovely one, at that. Cindylou
    • January 2000 MVA passenger, used jaws of life to retrieve me, neck injury and months of PT
    • June 2001 Bicycle accident, 2 compression fractures at T12/L1, Vertebroplasty Sept. 2001
    • April 2006 right hip, labral tear and repair
    • April 2007 3 level ProDisc @ L3/4, L4/5 & L5/6✷ ✷Lumbosacral transitional vertebra; Dr. Rudolph Bertagnoli
    • July 2, 2008 ALIF & Laminectomy @ L6/S1
    • July 30, 2008 re-opened 28 days later to remove bone cement that had leaked onto S1 nerve root
    • August 2008 Pulmonary embolism, double pneumonia, collapsed left lung, re-hospitalized 1 week
    • March 10, 2009 Right SI Joint Fusion
    • April 27, 2010 2nd right hip arthroscopy to remove adhesions and release psoas muscle
    • September 30, 2010 lumbar facet rhizotomy
    • December 9, 2010 12 bilateral lumbar trigger point and steroid injections
    • December 23, 2010 12 more bilateral trigger point injections w/o steroid
    • February 15, 2011 ESI bilaterally in lower lumbar...relief only for few days. Considering 1 more.
    Did Spinal Cord Stimulator trial from 5/11/11-5/17/11 with excellent results; Spinal Cord Stimulator surgery is Monday,
    July 18, 2011

  10. #10
    Senior Member bigdogchief76's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Wichita KS
    Posts
    141

    Default Re: ADR vs Fusion

    So I'm working up all the logistics to see a neurosurgeon in Wichita.

    We have a Spine Clinic which is one of the better ones in the Great Plains area.

    They have this written on their website, which I am going to get some more detailed answers about, but, it's interesting none the less. If I end up going with one of the doctors from this clinic, the facilities are FAR better then the hospital that I have to use under my plan for in-network.

    "If your insurance has “out of network” benefits, you may use KSH (Kansas Spine Hospital) without paying out-of-network rates. You will still be responsible for your deductible, co-pay and co-insurance, the same as if you were using a contracting hospital"

    Does this sound crazy????

    I am going to discuss the ADR, simply to have an alternative planned out if this fusion procedure gets continually denied by AETNA. Plus, they might have some more insight into what's going on with the disc at the L5-S1. I trust my current spine doc, but, I want some more opinions.

    Wish I could just get fixed sooner than later, but, will be patient with this.

    Thanks for all of your feedback.

    MB
    Matt Brown

    L5-S1 DDD with retrolisthesis, central HNP and severe discogenic pain
    18 March 2011 - Pro-Disc L installation
    Proud Air Force Veteran
    Daddy to 2 beautiful little girls

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Have to do fusion, not a candidate for ADR
    By herniated C6-7 in forum Spinal Fusion (Including Discectomy & Laminectomy Procedures)
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 12-09-2010, 08:14 PM
  2. Failing ADR need Fusion
    By azennaro in forum Spinal Fusion (Including Discectomy & Laminectomy Procedures)
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-23-2010, 02:53 AM
  3. New member looking for some advice - cervical ADR or fusion?
    By Elwood30 in forum Artificial Disc Replacement
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 05-20-2010, 04:19 PM
  4. Some statistics comparing fusion to Cervical ADR
    By cavalier in forum Artificial Disc Replacement
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-04-2009, 10:36 AM
  5. [Artificial Disc Replacement] ADR Combined With Fusion vs. 2-Level Fusion in Cervical 2-Level Disc Disease
    By Justin in forum Education, Research and Spine Publications
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-16-2009, 07:07 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •