This is a discussion on Alignment more important than graft type for anterior cervical fusion success within the Education, Research and Spine Publications forums, part of the General Spine Discussion Forums category; Alignment more important than graft type for anterior cervical fusion success OrthoSupersite By Lee Beadling November 2009 SAN FRANCISCO — ...
Alignment more important than graft type for anterior cervical fusion success
OrthoSupersite
By Lee Beadling
November 2009
SAN FRANCISCO — While the use of either lordotic or parallel-shaped allografts had no effect on outcomes of anterior cervical decompression fusion, the accuracy of the segmental sagittal alignment did relate to clinical improvement, according to a prospective, randomized clinical trial.
“It doesn’t matter if you use parallel or lordotic grafts in anterior cervical decompression fusion, it matters that you maintain or improve the segmental sagittal alignment in those patients,” Alan Villavicencio, MD, said at the 24th Annual Meeting of the North American Spine Society.
According to the study abstract, 122 patients were enrolled in the study and were randomized to receive a lordotic allograft (57 patients) or a parallel allograft (65 patients). Average patient age was 49.9 years and mean follow-up was 37.5 months.
Pre- and postoperative assessments were performed radiographically and clinically using a Visual Analog Scale, SF-36 and the Neck Disability Index (NDI), Villavicencio said. Sagittal alignment was measured using a posterior tangent method on cervical lateral neutral radiographs. Two sagittal alignment parameters were measured.
“There were also no statistically significant differences in the clinical outcomes between the lordotic and parallel graft groups, VAS, SF-36 and NDI,” he said.
The mean postoperative cervical alignment was 18.6° in the lordotic group and 18.2° in the parallel group.
“In 68 patients who had either maintenance or improvement of sagittal alignment compared to 17 patients who had a loss of sagittal alignment with a change toward lordosis, the patients with maintained or improved alignment, had statistically significant improvement in their SF-36 and the NDI scores,” he said.
Reference:
Villavicencio A, Babuska J, Nelson E, et al. Correlation of clinical outcomes and cervical sagittal alignment: A prospective randomized clinical study. Paper #4. Presented at the 24th Annual Meeting of the North American Spine Society. Nov. 10-14, 2009. San Francisco.
Justin Averna
Founder & President, Spine Patient Society™
www.SpinePatientSociety.org
A 501(c)(3) Tax-Exempt Nonprofit & Charitable Organization
I'm here to help.
- 1994: Football Injury, Severe Hyperextension
- 1997: Snow Skiing Injury
- 3/7/1997: Laminotomy L4/L5
- 1999 & 2003: Motor Vehicle Accidents (not at fault both times) --> Grade V Annular Tears L4/L5 & L5/L6
- 11/15/2003: 2-Level ProDisc® L4/L5 & L5/L6*, *lumbosacral transitional vertebra --> Dr. Rudolf Bertagnoli
- 4/2008: 4.5 years pain-free before "new" leg pain
- 5/14/2009: Dynamic Stabilization System L4/L5, Dr. Rudolf Bertagnoli
Questions? Suggestions? Need help with registering, creating a signature, etc.?
justin (at) spinepatientsociety.org
Disclosure: I have no financial relationships with any surgeons, spine clinics, device manufacturers, pharmaceutical companies, hospitals, etc. -- the SPS Board of Directors serve without compensation.
Bookmarks