This is a discussion on Biomechanical Analysis of a Disc Prosthesis Distal to a Scoliosis Model within the Education, Research and Spine Publications forums, part of the General Spine Discussion Forums category; Spine . 34(14):1470-1475, June 15, 2009. Biomechanical Analysis of a Disc Prosthesis Distal to a Scoliosis Model. Quirno, Martin MD ...
Spine. 34(14):1470-1475, June 15, 2009.
Biomechanical Analysis of a Disc Prosthesis Distal to a Scoliosis Model.
Quirno, Martin MD *; Kamerlink, Jonathan R. MD *; Valdevit, Antonio MSc *; Kang, Matthew MD *; Yaszay, Burt MD +; Duncan, Naphysah ME *; Boachie-Adjei, Oheneba MD ++; Lonner, Baron S. MD *; Errico, Thomas J. MD *
Institution From the *NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, NY; +Rady Children's Hospital, San Diego, CA; and ++Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY.
Study Design. Biomechanical study of bovine spines.
Objective. The purpose of this study was to perform a biomechanical test to analyze intervertebral deflections following placement of both 1 and 2 semiconstrained TDRs in the subjacent segments of a long fusion.
Summary of Background Data. Long-term sequela of long lumbar fusion for scoliosis include adjacent segment disease and flatback syndrome. Total disc replacement (TDR) is a viable option for the treatment of these conditions. Little data has been published regarding the placement of a TDR distal to a scoliosis fusion.
Methods. Six thoracolumbar bovine spines (T12-S1) were instrumented from T12 to L5, with bilateral pedicle screw fixation at each level. L5-L6 and L6-S1 served as the test levels. One TDR (FlexiCore, Stryker Spine, Allendale, NJ) was initially performed adjacent to the fusion, followed by a subsequent TDR insertion at the last spinal segment. The applied load, total specimen deflection, and local transducer deflections were recorded before and after a TDR at both levels. The results were expressed as a percentage of the intact specimen. Flexion, extension, lateral bending, and torsional deflections were recorded.
Results. There were no significant differences (P > 0.05) in sensor deflection observed at the L5-L6 and L6-S1 levels in the anterior and lateral transducers when compared to intact spines specimens. A similar effect was observed at the L5-L6 and L6-S1 levels in the anterior and lateral transducers when compared to intact or prior L5-L6 and intact L6-S1 constructs.
Conclusion. This study has shown that using the FlexiCore system at 1 and/or 2 intervertebral disc spaces caudal to a scoliosis fusion model did not significantly change the sensor deflection at the 2 segments adjacent to a scoliosis fusion construct. Future research will continue to define the clinical setting and patients best suited for management by TDR systems.
(C) 2009 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.
Justin Averna
Founder & President, Spine Patient Society™
www.SpinePatientSociety.org
A 501(c)(3) Tax-Exempt Nonprofit & Charitable Organization
I'm here to help.
- 1994: Football Injury, Severe Hyperextension
- 1997: Snow Skiing Injury
- 3/7/1997: Laminotomy L4/L5
- 1999 & 2003: Motor Vehicle Accidents (not at fault both times) --> Grade V Annular Tears L4/L5 & L5/L6
- 11/15/2003: 2-Level ProDisc® L4/L5 & L5/L6*, *lumbosacral transitional vertebra --> Dr. Rudolf Bertagnoli
- 4/2008: 4.5 years pain-free before "new" leg pain
- 5/14/2009: Dynamic Stabilization System L4/L5, Dr. Rudolf Bertagnoli
Questions? Suggestions? Need help with registering, creating a signature, etc.?
justin (at) spinepatientsociety.org
Disclosure: I have no financial relationships with any surgeons, spine clinics, device manufacturers, pharmaceutical companies, hospitals, etc. -- the SPS Board of Directors serve without compensation.
Bookmarks