Results 1 to 2 of 2

Clinical outcome of the Dynardi dynamic artificial disc: 6 months preliminary results

This is a discussion on Clinical outcome of the Dynardi dynamic artificial disc: 6 months preliminary results within the Education, Research and Spine Publications forums, part of the General Spine Discussion Forums category; Surgical Neurology Volume 72, Issue 5, November 2009, Page 515 Clinical outcome of the Dynardi dynamic artificial disc: 6 months ...

  1. #1
    Founder / Administrator Justin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Philadelphia
    Posts
    4,503

    Post Clinical outcome of the Dynardi dynamic artificial disc: 6 months preliminary results

    Surgical Neurology
    Volume 72, Issue 5, November 2009, Page 515

    Clinical outcome of the Dynardi dynamic artificial disc: 6 months preliminary results

    F. Schils MDa, A. Kirgis MDb, A. Sporns MDc, C. Etter MDd, G. Veeckmans MDe, O. Schwarzenbach MDf and J. Bleyen MDg. aClinique St Joseph Liège, Belgium. bOCM Munich, Germany. cHKS, Schwerin, Germany. dKlinik im Schachen, Aarau, Switzerland. eSt Dymphna, Geel, Belgium. fRuckenzentrum, Thun, Switzerland. gA.Z Maria Middelares, Gent, Belgium. © 2009 Published by Elsevier Inc.

    Introduction

    Preliminary clinical evaluation of a new lumbar disc prosthesis. Prospective multicenter study.

    Material and methods

    • Results for patients who reached a minimum 6 months follow-up (N = 51) and complications for all patients (N = 72) are reported.
    • Inclusion criteria were discogenic low back pain, one or two segments and failed conservative treatment (6 months).
    • Exclusion criteria were: poor bone quality, deformities, facet joint arthrosis, posterior instability, fractures, spondylodiscitis and degenerative spondylolisthesis.
    • The Dynardi was implanted via retro- or transperitoneal approach. Results were collected preoperatively, 6 weeks and 6 months after surgery. For clinical outcomes, the Oswestry Disability Index (0-100%) and back and leg pain on the Visual Analog Scale (0-10) were documented. Wilcoxon test was used for statistics.
    Results

    • 51 patients (28 females, 23 males) were analyzed. Mean age was 43.7 years (24-65). Diagnoses were DDD with herniation (53%) and DDD only (47%). The treated levels were L4-L5 (23%), L5-S1 (67%) and L4-L5/L5-S1 (10%).
    • 2 adverse events not device-related were described (blood vessel damage resolved during surgery, radiculopathy treated by microdecompression 6 weeks post-surgery). One case of subsidence was reported after 6 weeks.
    • Mean ODI decreased significantly from 45% preop to 25% at 6 weeks (P < .001) and 16% six months postoperatively (P < .001). Average back pain improved significantly from 6.8 preop to 2.4 6 weeks postoperatively (P < .001) and 1.9 at 6 months (P < .001).
    • Average leg pain dropped from 4.5 preop to 2.4 and 1.2 at 6 weeks and 6 months (P < .001).
    Conclusion

    Although the preliminary results of the Dynardi are promising, more data are required to determine whether the clinical success continues in the long term.

    Total disc replacement; Lumbar; Dynardi dynamic artificial disc

    Justin Averna
    Founder & President, Spine Patient Society™
    www.SpinePatientSociety.org
    A 501(c)(3) Tax-Exempt Nonprofit & Charitable Organization


    • 1994: Football Injury, Severe Hyperextension
    • 1997: Snow Skiing Injury
    • 3/7/1997: Laminotomy L4/L5
    • 1999 & 2003: Motor Vehicle Accidents (not at fault both times) --> Grade V Annular Tears L4/L5 & L5/L6
    • 11/15/2003: 2-Level ProDisc® L4/L5 & L5/L6*, *lumbosacral transitional vertebra --> Dr. Rudolf Bertagnoli
    • 4/2008: 4.5 years pain-free before "new" leg pain
    • 5/14/2009: Dynamic Stabilization System L4/L5, Dr. Rudolf Bertagnoli
    I'm here to help.
    Questions? Suggestions? Need help with registering, creating a signature, etc.?
    justin (at) spinepatientsociety.org


    Disclosure: I have no financial relationships with any surgeons, spine clinics, device manufacturers, pharmaceutical companies, hospitals, etc. -- the SPS Board of Directors serve without compensation.

  2. #2
    Senior Member JK2234's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    253

    Default .

    I just seen a pic of this disc on google images...
    C4-5: Mild disc height loss with central annular fissure. Small broad-based left paracentral disc protrusion. Moderate central canal stenosis-the disc protrusion abuts and mildly flattens the left ventral surface of the spinal canal.

    C5-6: Disc desiccation with mild height loss.Diffuse discosteophyte bulge and uncovertebral joint hypertrophy, moderate central canal stenosis- Severe neuroforaminal stenosis bilaterally, right greater than left

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •