Results 1 to 3 of 3

Correlation of ProDisc-C Failure Strength With Cervical Bone Mineral Content and Endplate Strength

This is a discussion on Correlation of ProDisc-C Failure Strength With Cervical Bone Mineral Content and Endplate Strength within the Education, Research and Spine Publications forums, part of the General Spine Discussion Forums category; Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques . 21(6):400-405, August 2008. Correlation of ProDisc-C Failure Strength With Cervical Bone Mineral Content ...

  1. #1
    Founder / Administrator Justin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Philadelphia
    Posts
    4,503

    Default Correlation of ProDisc-C Failure Strength With Cervical Bone Mineral Content and Endplate Strength

    Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques. 21(6):400-405, August 2008.

    Correlation of ProDisc-C Failure Strength With Cervical Bone Mineral Content and Endplate Strength.

    Zhang, Xingkai MD *; Ordway, Nathaniel R. MS +; Tan, Rong MD ++; Rim, Byeong Cheol MD [S]; Fayyazi, Amir H. MD +
    Institution (*)Shanghai Jiaotong University Medical College Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Institute of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Shanghai
    (++)Department of Orthopedics, 306 Hospital of PLA, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China
    (+)Department of Orthopedics, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY
    ([S])Department of Neurosurgery, Hana General Hospital, 566 GaKyung-Dong, CheongJu-City, Chungbuk, South Korea


    Study Design: This study was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of preoperative computed tomography (CT) scan in predicting endplate strength.

    Objective: To demonstrate a correlation between the cervical trabecular bone density and the failure strength of the endplate.

    Summary of Background Data: Cervical total disc arthroplasty devices have to transmit the force to the endplate for the remainder of the patients' life. One potential complication at this interface is endplate fracture and implant subsidence, which usually occurs early postoperatively and may be related to weakness of the boney endplate.

    Methods: Six fresh human cadaver cervical spines were harvested and scanned for the determination of trabecular density using a peripheral quantitative CT (QCT) scanner. The specimens were then disarticulated and the inferior endplate of each vertebral segment was biomechanically tested using a 2-mm indentation probe to determine average endplate strength. The superior endplate of each vertebral body was then fitted with the appropriately sized ProDisc-C endplate and biomechanically tested until failure. Regression analyses were used to compare the interface failure stress of the implant with the bone mineral content and the average endplate stress as measured with the indentation probe.

    Results: The average bone mineral content of the specimens was 322+/-57 mg/cm3. The average endplate strength and stress measured by the indentation test was 176+/-129 N and 56+/-34 N/mm2, respectively. The average ProDisc-C/endplate failure load and failure stress were 1875+/-1023 N and 10.2+/-4.1 N/mm2, respectively. There was a direct correlation between the ProDisc-C/endplate failure stress and the bone mineral content measured by peripheral QCT (R2=0.48, P<0.01). There was also a significant correlation between ProDisc-C/endplate failure stress and the endplate indentation stress.

    Conclusions: This study demonstrates the utility of a preoperative QCT scan in predicting the failure stress of the cervical endplate before total disc replacement. This information may potentially decrease early complications of device subsidence or endplate fracture.

    (C) 2008 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.

    Justin Averna
    Founder & President, Spine Patient Society™
    www.SpinePatientSociety.org
    A 501(c)(3) Tax-Exempt Nonprofit & Charitable Organization


    • 1994: Football Injury, Severe Hyperextension
    • 1997: Snow Skiing Injury
    • 3/7/1997: Laminotomy L4/L5
    • 1999 & 2003: Motor Vehicle Accidents (not at fault both times) --> Grade V Annular Tears L4/L5 & L5/L6
    • 11/15/2003: 2-Level ProDisc® L4/L5 & L5/L6*, *lumbosacral transitional vertebra --> Dr. Rudolf Bertagnoli
    • 4/2008: 4.5 years pain-free before "new" leg pain
    • 5/14/2009: Dynamic Stabilization System L4/L5, Dr. Rudolf Bertagnoli
    I'm here to help.
    Questions? Suggestions? Need help with registering, creating a signature, etc.?
    justin (at) spinepatientsociety.org


    Disclosure: I have no financial relationships with any surgeons, spine clinics, device manufacturers, pharmaceutical companies, hospitals, etc. -- the SPS Board of Directors serve without compensation.

  2. #2
    Senior Member treefrog's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Raleigh, NC USA
    Posts
    242

    Default

    Conclusions: This study demonstrates the utility of a preoperative QCT scan in predicting the failure stress of the cervical endplate before total disc replacement. This information may potentially decrease early complications of device subsidence or endplate fracture.
    Do you think the same would be true of lumbar endplate testing, or can this test be used on the lumbar spine?
    Cathy

    DDD
    L4/5; L5/6(S1) pain generators
    Two-level ADR with Dr. Bertagnoli May 26, 2009
    Prodisc-L

    SUCCESS!!

  3. #3
    Founder / Administrator Justin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Philadelphia
    Posts
    4,503

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by treefrog View Post
    Do you think the same would be true of lumbar endplate testing, or can this test be used on the lumbar spine?
    I think it could be extrapolated to the lumbar spine. The scanner could be used in a similar fashion and then they could replicate their methods and apply them to the lumbar endplates.

    Justin Averna
    Founder & President, Spine Patient Society™
    www.SpinePatientSociety.org
    A 501(c)(3) Tax-Exempt Nonprofit & Charitable Organization


    • 1994: Football Injury, Severe Hyperextension
    • 1997: Snow Skiing Injury
    • 3/7/1997: Laminotomy L4/L5
    • 1999 & 2003: Motor Vehicle Accidents (not at fault both times) --> Grade V Annular Tears L4/L5 & L5/L6
    • 11/15/2003: 2-Level ProDisc® L4/L5 & L5/L6*, *lumbosacral transitional vertebra --> Dr. Rudolf Bertagnoli
    • 4/2008: 4.5 years pain-free before "new" leg pain
    • 5/14/2009: Dynamic Stabilization System L4/L5, Dr. Rudolf Bertagnoli
    I'm here to help.
    Questions? Suggestions? Need help with registering, creating a signature, etc.?
    justin (at) spinepatientsociety.org


    Disclosure: I have no financial relationships with any surgeons, spine clinics, device manufacturers, pharmaceutical companies, hospitals, etc. -- the SPS Board of Directors serve without compensation.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •