This is a discussion on Difference in Occurrence of Heterotopic Ossification According to Prosthesis Type in the Cervical Artificial Disc Replacement within the Education, Research and Spine Publications forums, part of the General Spine Discussion Forums category; Spine . Volume 35(16), 15 July 2010, pp 1556-1561 Difference in Occurrence of Heterotopic Ossification According to Prosthesis Type in ...
Spine. Volume 35(16), 15 July 2010, pp 1556-1561
Difference in Occurrence of Heterotopic Ossification According to Prosthesis Type in the Cervical Artificial Disc Replacement
Yi, Seong MD, PhD*; Kim, Keung Nyun MD, PhD*; Yang, Moon Sul MD*; Yang, Joong Won MD*; Kim, Hoon MD*; Ha, Yoon MD, PhD*; Yoon, Do Heum MD, PhD*; Shin, Hyun Chul MD, PhD†. Author Information: From the *Department of Neurosurgery, Spine and Spinal Cord Institute, Yonsei University, College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; and †Department of Neurosurgery, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. © 2010 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.
Study Design. Retrospective study of the difference of heterotopic ossification (HO) occurrence according to 3 different types of prosthesis.
Objective. This study was designed to investigate the difference of HO occurrence according to different type of prosthesis.
Summary of Background Data. HO is defined as formation of the bone outside the skeletal system. Reported HO occurrence rate in cervical artificial disc replacement (ADR) was unexpectedly high and varied. But the influencing factors of HO in cervical ADR have not been elucidated well. The prosthesis-related factors for making difference of HO occurrence were investigated in this study.
Methods. A total of 170 patients undergoing cervical arthroplasty with the Bryan cervical disc prosthesis (Medtroic Sofamor Danek, Memphis, TN), Mobi-C disc prosthesis (LDR Medical, Troyes, France), and ProDisc-C (Synthes, Inc., West Chester, PA) were included. Cervical lateral radiographs obtained before and after surgery were used to identify HO. Occurrence rate, occurrence-free period, location, and grade of HOs were investigated according to the different prosthesis.
Results. Each prosthesis group included patients as follows: Bryan disc, 81 patients; Mobi-C, 61 patients; and ProDisc-C, 28 patients. Overall HO rate was 40.6% (69 of 170 patients). Each HO occurrence rate by prosthesis was as follows: the Bryan disc group, 21.0%; Mobi-C group, 52.5%; and the ProDisc-C group, 71.4%. In the survival analysis, all patients showed 27.1 ± 3.7 months as the median survival. The Bryan disc group showed statistically longer survival (48.4 ± 7.4 months) than the other groups.
Conclusion. Occurrence of HO is an inevitable postoperative complication after cervical ADR. The occurrence rate of HO was higher than our expectation. Moreover, definite differences in occurrence rate according to the prosthesis type were identified by this study.
Justin Averna
Founder & President, Spine Patient Society™
www.SpinePatientSociety.org
A 501(c)(3) Tax-Exempt Nonprofit & Charitable Organization
I'm here to help.
- 1994: Football Injury, Severe Hyperextension
- 1997: Snow Skiing Injury
- 3/7/1997, 17 years old: Laminotomy L4/L5
- 1999 & 2003: Motor Vehicle Accidents (not at fault both times) --> Grade V Annular Tears L4/L5 & L5/L6
- 11/15/2003, 23 years old: 2-Level ProDisc® L4/L5 & L5/L6*, *lumbosacral transitional vertebra --> Dr. Rudolf Bertagnoli
- 4/2008: 4.5 years pain-free before "new" leg pain
- 5/14/2009, 29 years old: Dynamic Stabilization System L4/L5, Dr. Rudolf Bertagnoli
Questions? Suggestions? Need help with registering, creating a signature, etc.?
justin (at) spinepatientsociety.org
Disclosure: I have no financial relationships with any surgeons, spine clinics, device manufacturers, pharmaceutical companies, hospitals, etc. -- the SPS Board of Directors serve without compensation.
Bookmarks