+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 2 of 2

The Natural History of Polyethylene Oxidation in Total Disc Replacement

This is a discussion on The Natural History of Polyethylene Oxidation in Total Disc Replacement within the Education, Research and Spine Publications forums, part of the General Spine Discussion Forums category; Spine. Volume 34, Number 22, pp 2369 –2377 The Natural History of Polyethylene Oxidation in Total Disc Replacement Kurtz, Steven ...

  1. #1
    Founder / Administrator Justin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Philadelphia
    Posts
    4,375

    Default The Natural History of Polyethylene Oxidation in Total Disc Replacement

    Spine. Volume 34, Number 22, pp 2369 –2377

    The Natural History of Polyethylene Oxidation in Total Disc Replacement

    Kurtz, Steven M. PhD *+; MacDonald, Daniel BS *; Ianuzzi, Allyson PhD *+; van Ooij, Andre MD ++; Isaza, Jorge MD [S]; Ross, Edward R. MD [P]; Regan, John MD [//][S]. (C) 2009 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.

    From the *Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA; †Exponent Inc, Menlo Park, CA; ‡VieCuri Medical Centre, Venio, The Netherlands; [S]Our Lady of the Lake Medical Center, Louisiana, LA; ¶Hope Hospital, Salford, United Kingdom; an[//]Cedar Sinai Institute for Spinal Disorders, Los Angeles, CA.


    Study Design. This study is an evaluation of wear and oxidation in retrieved total disc replacements (TDRs). Forty-eight CHARITE TDRs were retrieved from 41 patients after 7.8 years of average implantation. All implants were removed because of intractable back pain and/or facet degeneration. Three unimplanted implants served as controls.

    Objective. Our aim was to determine whether [gamma]-sterilized polyethylene components implanted in the spine oxidize in vivo, and if so, whether polyethylene oxidation has clinical relevance for the long-term performance of TDRs.

    Summary of Background Data. The natural history of polyethylene oxidation following gamma sterilization and long-term implantation in the spine has not yet been investigated.

    Methods. Oxidation and oxidation potential were measured at the rim and dome of 47 components using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. The wear patterns of each retrieved polyethylene core were analyzed at the rim and dome.

    Results. Oxidation was significantly higher at the rim, as compared with the dome of the cores. Hydroperoxide index was also significantly higher at the rim, as compared with the dome. Dome penetration rate was negatively correlated to implantation time (P < 0.0001) but not correlated to oxidation or hydroperoxide index (P > 0.05). Implants with evidence of chronic rim loading had higher rim oxidation.

    Conclusion. The data support our hypothesis that, for the historical packaging methods employed by the manufacturer, polyethylene oxidation and oxidation potential were significantly higher at the rim as opposed to the dome. The mechanism is governed by access to oxygen in vivo and may be accelerated under certain combined modes of repeated rim loading. Our findings have clinical significance in cases of chronic impingement, when the rim has to support repeated loading for the lifetime of the implant.

    Justin Averna
    Founder & President, Spine Patient Society™
    www.SpinePatientSociety.org
    A 501(c)(3) Tax-Exempt Nonprofit & Charitable Organization

    • 1994: Football Injury, Severe Hyperextension
    • 1997: Snow Skiing Injury
    • 3/7/1997, 17 years old: Laminotomy L4/L5
    • 1999 & 2003: Motor Vehicle Accidents (not at fault both times) --> Grade V Annular Tears L4/L5 & L5/L6
    • 11/15/2003, 23 years old: 2-Level ProDisc® L4/L5 & L5/L6*, *lumbosacral transitional vertebra --> Dr. Rudolf Bertagnoli
    • 4/2008: 4.5 years pain-free before "new" leg pain
    • 5/14/2009, 29 years old: Dynamic Stabilization System L4/L5, Dr. Rudolf Bertagnoli
    I'm here to help.
    Questions? Suggestions? Need help with registering, creating a signature, etc.?
    justin (at) spinepatientsociety.org


    Disclosure: I have no financial relationships with any surgeons, spine clinics, device manufacturers, pharmaceutical companies, hospitals, etc. -- the SPS Board of Directors serve without compensation.

  2. #2
    Senior Member ajj1001's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Manchester, UK
    Posts
    1,259

    Default

    my surgeon!
    Alison 46 year old female
    2011 Aug PLIF L4/L5 - L5/S1 both adr in situ
    2010 May - Discogram on L2/L3 & L3/L4, neither pain generators
    2009 May - Failed revision fusion on L5/S1 with Charite ADR in situ
    2008 Caudal epidural exacerbated nerve symptoms. Prolapse L2/L3
    2007 L5/S1 Facet deterioration
    Brilliant 5 years, no pain only minor motor problems and residual nerve damage
    2002 March - ADR Charite - L4/5, L5/S1
    2000 Disc prolapses L4/5, L5/S1

+ Reply to Thread

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts