I need to take this test...
This is a discussion on A New Performance Test for Cervical Myelopathy: The Triangle Step Test within the Education, Research and Spine Publications forums, part of the General Spine Discussion Forums category; Spine . Volume 35(1), 1 January 2010, pp 32-35 A New Performance Test for Cervical Myelopathy: The Triangle Step Test ...
Spine. Volume 35(1), 1 January 2010, pp 32-35
A New Performance Test for Cervical Myelopathy: The Triangle Step Test
Mihara, Hisanori MD; Kondo, Soichi MD; Murata, Atsushi MD; Ishida, Koh MD; Niimura, Takanori MD; Hachiya, Masashi MD. From the Division of Spine surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yokohama Minami Kyosai Hospital, Yokohama, Japan. © 2010 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.
Study Design. Our original performance test for evaluating the severity of cervical myelopathy, the triangle step test (TST), was introduced along with an assessment of its validity.
Objective. The TST was designed to evaluate the lower extremity motor function objectively and quantitatively. This study aimed to assess the validity of the test by analyzing the relation to the other analytic methods.
Summary of Background Data. Several rating scales and performance tests have been proposed to evaluate the severity of cervical myelopathy. Simple walking test is useful; however, the test is limited for the patients who can walk safely.
Methods. Each subject sitting on a chair was instructed to step on marks at each apex of a triangular board and the number of steps in 10 seconds was counted for each foot. The subjects were 270 cervical myelopathy patients who had visited our hospital since 2002. As a control group, 60 healthy adults also underwent this test. All subjects were simultaneously evaluated by the Nurick score, the Japan Orthopedic Association score and the finger grip and release test. An assessment of the effect of surgery was analyzed for 94 patients who underwent surgical treatments.
Results. The mean of the lower count for each subject (TST score) in the control group was 25.4 ± 3.7 steps, which was superior to 18.4 ± 5.2 steps for myelopathy patients. TST score significantly correlated to the other analytic measures for cervical myelopathy. Regarding the effect of surgery, a performance of 16.7 ± 4.5 steps before surgery improved to 21.2 ± 4.9 steps at follow-up. Patients who could step more than 20 times before surgery, showed greater neurologic recovery.
Conclusion. TST score correlated with other analytic methods for cervical myelopathy. This test is very useful to quantitatively evaluate lower extremity function and its improvement following surgical intervention.
cervical myelopathy, performance test, triangle step test
Justin Averna
Founder & President, Spine Patient Society™
www.SpinePatientSociety.org
A 501(c)(3) Tax-Exempt Nonprofit & Charitable Organization
I'm here to help.
- 1994: Football Injury, Severe Hyperextension
- 1997: Snow Skiing Injury
- 3/7/1997, 17 years old: Laminotomy L4/L5
- 1999 & 2003: Motor Vehicle Accidents (not at fault both times) --> Grade V Annular Tears L4/L5 & L5/L6
- 11/15/2003, 23 years old: 2-Level ProDisc® L4/L5 & L5/L6*, *lumbosacral transitional vertebra --> Dr. Rudolf Bertagnoli
- 4/2008: 4.5 years pain-free before "new" leg pain
- 5/14/2009, 29 years old: Dynamic Stabilization System L4/L5, Dr. Rudolf Bertagnoli
Questions? Suggestions? Need help with registering, creating a signature, etc.?
justin (at) spinepatientsociety.org
Disclosure: I have no financial relationships with any surgeons, spine clinics, device manufacturers, pharmaceutical companies, hospitals, etc. -- the SPS Board of Directors serve without compensation.
I need to take this test...
C4-5: Mild disc height loss with central annular fissure. Small broad-based left paracentral disc protrusion. Moderate central canal stenosis-the disc protrusion abuts and mildly flattens the left ventral surface of the spinal canal.
C5-6: Disc desiccation with mild height loss.Diffuse discosteophyte bulge anduncovertebral joint hypertrophy, moderate central canal stenosis- Severe neuroforaminal stenosis bilaterally, right greater than left
This seems like an easy test to self administer. What were the dimensions of the triangle and how far from the edge of the triangle were the subjects?
Materials and Methods
A triangular board measuring 30 cm on each side was prepared for the test and 3 stepping points were marked at each apex. The board was placed in front of a subject sitting on a chair and the subject was instructed to use their foot to step on each mark one after another as quickly as possible. The number of steps in 10 seconds was counted and recorded for each foot. The number of missed steps was not included in the total number of steps.
Justin Averna
Founder & President, Spine Patient Society™
www.SpinePatientSociety.org
A 501(c)(3) Tax-Exempt Nonprofit & Charitable Organization
I'm here to help.
- 1994: Football Injury, Severe Hyperextension
- 1997: Snow Skiing Injury
- 3/7/1997, 17 years old: Laminotomy L4/L5
- 1999 & 2003: Motor Vehicle Accidents (not at fault both times) --> Grade V Annular Tears L4/L5 & L5/L6
- 11/15/2003, 23 years old: 2-Level ProDisc® L4/L5 & L5/L6*, *lumbosacral transitional vertebra --> Dr. Rudolf Bertagnoli
- 4/2008: 4.5 years pain-free before "new" leg pain
- 5/14/2009, 29 years old: Dynamic Stabilization System L4/L5, Dr. Rudolf Bertagnoli
Questions? Suggestions? Need help with registering, creating a signature, etc.?
justin (at) spinepatientsociety.org
Disclosure: I have no financial relationships with any surgeons, spine clinics, device manufacturers, pharmaceutical companies, hospitals, etc. -- the SPS Board of Directors serve without compensation.
Bookmarks