Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Sitting straight 'bad for backs'

This is a discussion on Sitting straight 'bad for backs' within the Education, Research and Spine Publications forums, part of the General Spine Discussion Forums category; Sitting straight 'bad for backs' Sitting up straight is not the best position for office workers, a study has suggested. ...

  1. #1
    Founder / Administrator Justin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Philadelphia
    Posts
    4,503

    Default Sitting straight 'bad for backs'

    Sitting straight 'bad for backs'
    Sitting up straight is not the best position for office workers, a study has suggested.

    Story from BBC NEWS: BBC News - Sitting straight 'bad for backs'. Published: 2006/11/28 00:46:56 GMT © BBC MMX

    Scottish and Canadian researchers used a new form of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to show it places an unnecessary strain on your back. They told the Radiological Society of North America that the best position in which to sit at your desk is leaning back, at about 135 degrees. Experts said sitting was known to contribute to lower back pain. Data from the British Chiropractic Association says 32% of the population spends more than 10 hours a day seated. Half do not leave their desks, even to have lunch. Two thirds of people also sit down at home when they get home from work.

    Spinal angles

    The research was carried out at Woodend Hospital in Aberdeen. Twenty two volunteers with healthy backs were scanned using a positional MRI machine, which allows patients the freedom to move - so they can sit or stand - during the test.

    “ Our bodies are not designed to be so sedentary,” Rishi Loatey, British Chiropractic Association
    Traditional scanners mean patients have to lie flat, which may mask causes of pain that stem from different movements or postures. In this study, the patients assumed three different sitting positions: a slouching position, in which the body is hunched forward as if they were leaning over a desk or a video game console, an upright 90-degree sitting position; and a "relaxed" position where they leaned back at 135 degrees while their feet remained on the floor.

    The researchers then took measurements of spinal angles and spinal disk height and movement across the different positions.

    Spinal disk movement occurs when weight-bearing strain is placed on the spine, causing the disk to move out of place. Disk movement was found to be most pronounced with a 90-degree upright sitting posture. It was least pronounced with the 135-degree posture, suggesting less strain is placed on the spinal disks and associated muscles and tendons in a more relaxed sitting position. The "slouch" position revealed a reduction in spinal disk height, signifying a high rate of wear and tear on the lowest two spinal levels. When they looked at all test results, the researchers said the 135-degree position was the best for backs, and say this is how people should sit.

    'Tendency to slide'

    Dr Waseem Bashir of the Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging at the University of Alberta Hospital, Canada, who led the study, said: "Sitting in a sound anatomic position is essential, since the strain put on the spine and its associated ligaments over time can lead to pain, deformity and chronic illness." Rishi Loatey of the British Chiropractic Association said: "One in three people suffer from lower back pain and to sit for long periods of time certainly contributes to this, as our bodies are not designed to be so sedentary." Levent Caglar from the charity BackCare, added: "In general, opening up the angle between the trunk and the thighs in a seated posture is a good idea and it will improve the shape of the spine, making it more like the natural S-shape in a standing posture. "As to what is the best angle between thigh and torso when seated, reclining at 135 degrees can make sitting more difficult as there is a tendency to slide off the seat: 120 degrees or less may be better."

    Justin Averna
    Founder & President, Spine Patient Society™
    www.SpinePatientSociety.org
    A 501(c)(3) Tax-Exempt Nonprofit & Charitable Organization


    • 1994: Football Injury, Severe Hyperextension
    • 1997: Snow Skiing Injury
    • 3/7/1997: Laminotomy L4/L5
    • 1999 & 2003: Motor Vehicle Accidents (not at fault both times) --> Grade V Annular Tears L4/L5 & L5/L6
    • 11/15/2003: 2-Level ProDisc® L4/L5 & L5/L6*, *lumbosacral transitional vertebra --> Dr. Rudolf Bertagnoli
    • 4/2008: 4.5 years pain-free before "new" leg pain
    • 5/14/2009: Dynamic Stabilization System L4/L5, Dr. Rudolf Bertagnoli
    I'm here to help.
    Questions? Suggestions? Need help with registering, creating a signature, etc.?
    justin (at) spinepatientsociety.org


    Disclosure: I have no financial relationships with any surgeons, spine clinics, device manufacturers, pharmaceutical companies, hospitals, etc. -- the SPS Board of Directors serve without compensation.

  2. #2
    Moderator KBear's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Denton, Texas
    Posts
    2,941

    Default Re: Sitting straight 'bad for backs'

    And I have just now (2 years later) adjusted to driving with my seat at a 90 degree angle. Guess I can go back to my old sloucher ways.

  3. #3
    Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Southport, NC
    Posts
    382
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default Re: Sitting straight 'bad for backs'

    Well I am glad they did that study.....cause I sure hit sitting straight up as it doesnt feel good, comfortable or natural. But I didn think my slouchig back was a good thing either.....oh well!

  4. #4
    Moderator Cindylou's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Minneapolis, Minnesota
    Posts
    2,380

    Default Re: Sitting straight 'bad for backs'

    I know I have seen and read something like this before, maybe even a year ago or so....that the 90 degree angle is not ideal for sitting and a little slouching is good. This has always made more sense to me. What I need work on is getting my core stronger so I'm not making my legs and spine do all the work. That's the bigger solution all the way around I think. Can I just say this: man, at 57 years old it's no easy feat to make that happen!
    • January 2000 MVA passenger, used jaws of life to retrieve me, neck injury and months of PT
    • June 2001 Bicycle accident, 2 compression fractures at T12/L1, Vertebroplasty Sept. 2001
    • April 2006 right hip, labral tear and repair
    • April 2007 3 level ProDisc @ L3/4, L4/5 & L5/6✷ ✷Lumbosacral transitional vertebra; Dr. Rudolph Bertagnoli
    • July 2, 2008 ALIF & Laminectomy @ L6/S1
    • July 30, 2008 re-opened 28 days later to remove bone cement that had leaked onto S1 nerve root
    • August 2008 Pulmonary embolism, double pneumonia, collapsed left lung, re-hospitalized 1 week
    • March 10, 2009 Right SI Joint Fusion
    • April 27, 2010 2nd right hip arthroscopy to remove adhesions and release psoas muscle
    • September 30, 2010 lumbar facet rhizotomy
    • December 9, 2010 12 bilateral lumbar trigger point and steroid injections
    • December 23, 2010 12 more bilateral trigger point injections w/o steroid
    • February 15, 2011 ESI bilaterally in lower lumbar...relief only for few days. Considering 1 more.
    Did Spinal Cord Stimulator trial from 5/11/11-5/17/11 with excellent results; Spinal Cord Stimulator surgery is Monday,
    July 18, 2011

  5. #5
    Senior Member Gilbert P's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Jackson Hole WY
    Posts
    876

    Default Re: Sitting straight 'bad for backs'

    Well this is something I have always had trouble doing.
    Sitting straight was a good thing in catholic school, If you slouched it was a yard stick across the knuckles

    My truck seat is reclined and the heat is on

    Gil
    L5-S1 lam 1994
    L2 to L5 DDD
    L3 -L4 hern Dec 2007.
    L4-L5 Annular fissure with mild central stenosis and moderate facet hypertrophy.
    L5-S1 bilaterial neural foraminal narrowing with inferior effacement.
    L2-L3 Right-sided neural foraminal narrowing
    L3-L4 related to posterolateral hypertrophic spurs and facet hypertrophy.
    C3-C4 limited DDD
    15 injections Depo. P.T. 18 months 9 dose packs,
    Nerve Block Injections.4 ESI S1
    L5-S1 Foraminotomy 09
    L4-L5 Microdiscectomy 09 ReHerniation 4-2010
    Surgery 6-29-11 L4-L5-S1 Decompression Fusion L5-S1 and Coflex F implants


  6. #6
    Moderator KBear's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Denton, Texas
    Posts
    2,941

    Default Re: Sitting straight 'bad for backs'

    Quote Originally Posted by Gilbert P View Post
    Well this is something I have always had trouble doing.
    Sitting straight was a good thing in catholic school, If you slouched it was a yard stick across the knuckles

    My truck seat is reclined and the heat is on

    Gil
    You too? I remember hiding in the handicap stall, sitting on the bars on one side with my feet on the other side, so the nuns wouldn't find me and make me go to church. They caught on and would pull your ear to get you out of there...owwww.
    31 years old- 1/06- In wreck with 18 wheeler at 25 years old; 6/06- Head on collision on Interstate, both wrecks other drivers fault. Numerous MRI's, PT, chiropractic, acupuncture, TENS therapy, massage therapy, facet injections, epidural injections, Nerve study, Discogram, confirms pain in L4/5, IDET, decompression, Bi-lateral neurotomy L3/4/5, denied by insurance twice, in Active L clinical trial, had surgery March 17, 2009 in Miami, FL- received Active L disc at 29 years old. Pain and medication free as of October 2010!Mommy to Emma- 8 years, Ava- 6 years & had baby Eli after ADR, via c-section on March 25, 2011 , completely pain free still!

  7. #7
    Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Southport, NC
    Posts
    382
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default Re: Sitting straight 'bad for backs'

    Quote Originally Posted by KBear View Post
    You too? I remember hiding in the handicap stall, sitting on the bars on one side with my feet on the other side, so the nuns wouldn't find me and make me go to church. They caught on and would pull your ear to get you out of there...owwww.
    I guess I was one of the lucky ones.....well sort of! I went to Catholic School when I lived in Philly but when we moved to NC after second grade we no longer went to Catholic School. Mom worked at the school in Philly so that mde it much more affordable to us kids to go to school. She got a job at the Caholic School in NC (30 miles from house verus 1/2 a mile) but the only discount on tuition was one kid free, the rest of us full price.....well we had 4 kids in school in our family at that time so it was't gonna happen.

    But the biggest part where I didn't luck out so much is when your own mother is the one disciplining you at school.....well lets just say the other kids had it easier There was one thing I hated more than anything about my mom being an assistant teacher at the school in Philly; around 10am everyday the assistant teacher (my mother) collected a quarter from any student who wanted a fresh soft Philadelphia pretzel.....YUMMMMM!!!!! And we were broke as hell so I didn't have any money and rarely ever did she give me a quarter for a pretzel.....A QUARTER And who would have noticed one lousy quarter missing from the jar? I mean come on, give your son a quarter for a pretzel

    Thank god for dads who would hook it up with the quarters

  8. #8
    Senior Member JK2234's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    253

    Default Re: Sitting straight 'bad for backs'

    good info...:thumpup:
    C4-5: Mild disc height loss with central annular fissure. Small broad-based left paracentral disc protrusion. Moderate central canal stenosis-the disc protrusion abuts and mildly flattens the left ventral surface of the spinal canal.

    C5-6: Disc desiccation with mild height loss.Diffuse discosteophyte bulge and uncovertebral joint hypertrophy, moderate central canal stenosis- Severe neuroforaminal stenosis bilaterally, right greater than left

  9. #9
    Senior Member KanRunMo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    USA Near Kansas City
    Posts
    296

    Default Re: Sitting straight 'bad for backs'

    OK. Either the slouchers are wrong or I didn't read this right. Isn't 135 degrees leaning a little further back than straight? Or does it mean leaning forward? However, CL is right in that strengthening the core for back support is the most important according to PTs.
    Diagnosis:
    Degenerative disc disease throughout spine
    Generalized disc bulging with mild narrowing of thecal sac in L2-L3, L3-L4, L4-L5, L5-S1.
    Moderate spinal stenosis L4-L5
    Foraminal narrowing
    Recent compression Fx at T10,T11.
    Treatment:
    Spinal decompression 2007
    Cortisone injection in lower back in 2010
    Relieved of pain for now
    Hope for ADR

  10. #10
    Moderator KBear's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Denton, Texas
    Posts
    2,941

    Default Re: Sitting straight 'bad for backs'

    I was asking the same thing about 135, but then I was thinking 180 would be lying flat, and 90 is straight up and down, so 135 is half way between the two (which seems like some pretty extreme slouching). I don't like to sit too slouched, not comfortable, especially driving at that angle, I would feel like I was laying down, but a little is nice. I did notice yesterday on my 4.5 hr drive home that I felt better sitting at the 90 degree angle. Not sure if this is because I am used to it now, or because that keeps the lumbar support in the right place with the most pressure.
    31 years old- 1/06- In wreck with 18 wheeler at 25 years old; 6/06- Head on collision on Interstate, both wrecks other drivers fault. Numerous MRI's, PT, chiropractic, acupuncture, TENS therapy, massage therapy, facet injections, epidural injections, Nerve study, Discogram, confirms pain in L4/5, IDET, decompression, Bi-lateral neurotomy L3/4/5, denied by insurance twice, in Active L clinical trial, had surgery March 17, 2009 in Miami, FL- received Active L disc at 29 years old. Pain and medication free as of October 2010!Mommy to Emma- 8 years, Ava- 6 years & had baby Eli after ADR, via c-section on March 25, 2011 , completely pain free still!

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •