Many here can sympathize with you, mindya. I am just about to start the BCBS battle. I have BCBS of Alabama. In my case, I have three level cervical DDD. One look at my X-Ray alone is enough to convince most people. BCBS would cover fusion, but I do not want fusion, since I'm still quite active. I also don't want to risk adjacent accelerated disc degeneration which is common after fusion.
I'm going for Artificial Disc Replacement (ADR) even though BCBS-AL has a specific policy of not covering ADR, stating that they consider the procedure "investigational". There's not much I can do when insurance companies decide that they are going to play doctor. I am still going to have the surgeon submit a pre-certification request, even though there is a 100% probability it will be rejected. This will set the foundation for later appeals for reimbursement of portions of the ADR procedure that are identical to the fusion procedure.
If i were in your position, I would work hard to get more expert analysis of your condition. Throughout this forum, you will find references to excellent spine surgeons in the U.S. and around the world. In my dealings with multiple surgeons, I have found that you have to keep searching until you find the one(s) that really know what they are doing. If you really need fusion, it should be possible to make a case for it. If indeed you do not have a stability problem, but some other problem creating nerve impingement or inflammation, a good spine surgeon should be able to nail it down. If it was me, I would serioulsy consider ADR, although it sounds like Anthem BCBS is not likely to cover ADR either if they are strict on their interpretation of medical necessity for fusion.
I don't feel liked I helped any, but keep searching.
Phil



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote

Bookmarks