Results 1 to 4 of 4

Fusion Rates: ALIF vs. XLIF

This is a discussion on Fusion Rates: ALIF vs. XLIF within the Spinal Fusion (Including Discectomy & Laminectomy Procedures) forums, part of the Spine Surgery Support category; OK, so I need a one level fusion at L4/L5. ALIF is more invasive than XLIF. But, is the fusion ...

  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Lancaster, PA
    Posts
    15

    Default Fusion Rates: ALIF vs. XLIF

    OK, so I need a one level fusion at L4/L5. ALIF is more invasive than XLIF. But, is the fusion rate for each procedure the same? How about the pain relief? I am all for shorter hospital stays and less damage to my body, but not necessarily if the surgery is not as successful. Please share any thoughts and links to studies that I may not know about.

    Scott
    Lower Back Pain, Right Leg Pain and Numbness.
    P T, NSAIDs - No Improvement
    2009 - MRI - Loss of height in L4/L5, darkening, and slight bulge into spinal canal.
    2009 - June 2010: Branch Blocks, Steroids, and RF Neuroabaltions. Some Pain Relief.
    2010 - Pain gets worse. Second MRI. L4/L5 is worse than before.
    2010 - Second Surgical Consult. Recommends ALIF and wants a discogram to confirm.
    2010 - Discogram (Versed!) Confirmed L4/L5 is bad. Doc called it IDDS (Internal Disc Disruption Syndrome)

  2. #2
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Oz
    Posts
    340

    Default Re: Fusion Rates: ALIF vs. XLIF

    Gday,

    Once you get to this stage you're wanting to know more than the average patient and you'll have to research. You're still in the same boat as everyone else with outcome uncertainty, but I spose at least you get some idea of what you're letting yourself in for.

    You'll find even for something as seemingly simple to monitor as fusion rates there'll be a lot of conflicting literature. Patient outcome is even more of a mess. The key is to remember success is generally defined as some reduction of disability. ALIF and XLIF both leave plenty of vision for the surgeon to clear the disc space, with cages and instrumentation the fusion rates should be similar. They are generally very high these days.

    The two big journals are spine and euro spine journal, so if you've got access to springer or something through work or uni you can have a read. Otherwise the abstracts aren't too bad, google scholar, pubmed etc. A lot of people have been down this path before, so you can search their posts and see them asking the same questions and finding answers on this forum and others like adrsupport etc. This can occasionaly be heartbreaking as you follow their story, other times great outcomes.

    Elsevier

    Good luck.

    edit - just be aware that 6 or 7 years ago these geniuses thought it'd be a great idea to do fusion without instrumentation, the BAK cage. This is what the Charite was compared to in the FDA studies, and obviously the fusion rates were crap as nothing was screwed into place.
    Last edited by Hooch; 01-13-2011 at 02:13 PM.

  3. #3
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    9

    Default Re: Fusion Rates: ALIF vs. XLIF

    I had XLIF surgery it certainley is not less invasive. I'm 2 plus years post op and have severe nerve damage, drop foot, wasting of muscles in my leg and severe swelling. They cut from the side opposed to the front but besides having to make their way around lot's of organ's, they weaken your femoral nerve (sometimes in my case permanently) and by going through the psoas muscle it actually causes a hot burning in your thigh. Mine is still present all this time later. If I had it to do over again I'd live with the before symptoms because my after symptoms have been actually worse. Sorry hate to be a debby downer but Ive got to be truthful. My level L4/L5. They presented it as "less invasive" I completely lost all use of my bladder and had complete incontience after the surgery. I'm not competley incontinent but still have a lot of urgency with now hesitancy because of the nerve damage. I know decisions are tough when it comes to surgery but the more I learn the more I'd never have gone through with this "less invasive" BS they tried to get me to believe!

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    157

    Default Re: Fusion Rates: ALIF vs. XLIF

    I don't know much about ALIF and XLIF other than both do require alot of movement of internal organs and are more invasive. So this doesn't really address your question of which surgery is more successful. Personally, I had a TLIF of the L4/L5 space which was done minimally invasive. My surgeon did say that he could have done either of the two approaches you mentioned in my situation, but his preference was for the TLIF. Hospital stay 4 days, incision site - 3 small (1 -1 1.5 ins.) incisions as opposed to one long incision. Swelling was minimal. I have 2 rods with 4 screws for instrumentation. Approach was from the posterior with minimal muscle movement/damage to reach my spine. My surgery completely resolved my presurgery issues. I would do this surgery again given the same circumstances, as opposed to living with the pain.

    Have you asked your surgeon which method he prefers and his reasoning for that particular approach? Is he recommending either approach due to specific issues with your spine he is trying to address? Or... is it he is just more comfortable with either of these approaches? The answer to these questions might help you make a decision as to which approach to use.


    Linda
    1976 - Fell from tree. The beginning!
    1985 - Car accident - pull back muscle.
    1985 - Spring 2010 -Flare ups off and on. Meds manage - Life goes on.
    9/2010 -Pain returns, Diag DDD of the L4/5 & L5/S1 space with arthritis. .
    10/ 2010 - Referral to PM Doctor & PT. PT not helpful. MRI confirms DDD, bulging disc of L4/5space. Pneumonia. Pain off charts!
    11/2010 - 3/ 2011 2 RSNB/2 ESI. Relief short lived . Referred to surgeon.
    6/29/11 -TLIF Fusion of L4/5 space.

Similar Threads

  1. [Spinal Fusion, Microdiscectomy & Laminectomy Procedures] Minimal Access Versus Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Meta-Analysis of Fusion Rates
    By Justin in forum Education, Research and Spine Publications
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-15-2010, 01:24 AM
  2. [Spinal Fusion, Microdiscectomy & Laminectomy Procedures] Complication Rates of Three Common Spine Procedures and Rates of Thromboembolism Following Spine Surgery Based on 108,419 Procedures
    By Justin in forum Education, Research and Spine Publications
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-17-2010, 06:21 PM
  3. [Spinal Fusion / Lumbar] Fusion (ALIF) at L4-L5 and stabilization of existing fusion (PLIF) at L5-S1
    By Wishful Runner in forum Surgical Outcomes
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: 10-15-2010, 12:21 AM
  4. [Spinal Fusion / Lumbar] XLIF, ALIF patient feedback- surgery scheduled October 2010
    By staceyb in forum Surgical Outcomes
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 08-27-2010, 07:02 PM
  5. [Spinal Fusion, Microdiscectomy & Laminectomy Procedures] The Effect of Electrical Stimulation on Lumbar Spinal Fusion in Older Patients -- Part 2: Fusion Rates
    By Justin in forum Education, Research and Spine Publications
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-29-2009, 08:58 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •