None of these are inherently effective, depending on which literature you read. The Epiduroscopy has gone out of favor as been ineffective and rarely (if ever) covered by insurance. The Racz catheter shows promise, but the results have been iffy. I had one of these procedures done about 2 years ago and, while the doctor claimed it was the next best thing since sliced bread, it didn't do a whole lot. The way someone explained it to me is that hitting well fomed scar tissue with saline/steroids it tantamount to spraying water at a concrete brick wall. It just doesn't have the ability to break it down. Now, I'm not an expert (just giving my own experience), but some still swear by it.
Not sure where you came up with this blanket conclusion, and would certainly appreciate data to support this claim. As someone who had an endoscopic microdiscectomy at L5/S1, I can tell you that there most certainly IS scarring which results from this type of surgery. While I wouldn't characterize my example as significant scarring, a recent EMG showed that there is continued impingement of my S1 nerve root, most likely consistent with fibrotic adhesion. I certainly don't want to find fault with your logic, but just want people to understand the reality of MIS surgery.



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks


Reply With Quote

Bookmarks